Tables
| Team |
P |
W |
D |
L |
GF |
GA |
GD |
Pts |
Form |
| |
Overall |
Home |
Away |
| Team |
P |
W |
D |
L |
GF |
GA |
Pts |
P |
W |
D |
L |
GF |
GA |
Pts |
P |
W |
D |
L |
GF |
GA |
Pts |
- Promotion
- Promotion Play-Off
- Relegation
| |
Overall |
Home |
Away |
| Team |
W |
WD |
D |
DL |
L |
CS |
FS |
W |
WD |
D |
DL |
L |
CS |
FS |
W |
WD |
D |
DL |
L |
CS |
FS |
Fixtures
Sunderland
Middlesbrough
Sunderland
Middlesbrough
+ Sunderland's Strengths
|
Creating chances through individual skill
|
Very Strong
|
|
Finishing scoring chances
|
Strong
|
|
Counter attacks
|
Strong
|
|
Coming back from losing positions
|
Strong
|
|
Creating scoring chances
|
Strong
|
+ Middlesbrough's Strengths
|
Counter attacks
|
Very Strong
|
|
Attacking down the wings
|
Strong
|
|
Creating chances through individual skill
|
Strong
|
|
Finishing scoring chances
|
Strong
|
|
Creating scoring chances
|
Strong
|
|
Defending set pieces
|
Strong
|
- Sunderland's Weaknesses
- Middlesbrough's Weaknesses
|
Avoiding offside
|
Weak
|
|
Aerial duels
|
Weak
|
|
Avoiding individual errors
|
Weak
|
Sunderland's Style
-
Control the game in the opposition's half
-
Attacking down the left
-
Take a lot of shots
-
Opponents play aggressively against them
-
Consistent first eleven
Middlesbrough's Style
-
Attacking down the right
-
Possession football
-
Short passes
-
Attempt through balls often
-
Control the game in the opposition's half
-
Attack through the middle
-
Non-aggressive
-
Play the offside trap
-
Opponents play aggressively against them
© WhoScored.com
* Strengths, weaknesses and styles are calculated from statistics of each player's latest two seasons
Match Forecast
|
Sunderland will score as a result of an opposition error
|
Likely |
* Match forecast is generated from clashes in team characteristics.
1-0
Sunderland have beaten Boro just once in their last 14 competitive meetings.
Derbys don’t usually favour the Mackems … 1-2
@Bilcao Love it. I asked last week for you to return to predicting against us as every result you have given has been wrong. Thanks and same again next week please.