|
Created a high number of chances relative to their possession
|
Stole the ball often from the opposition
|
|
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities from set-pieces
|
Were effective at creating goalscoring opportunities through individual skill
|
|
Were strong at finishing
|
|
Were aggressive
|
Gave away a lot of free-kicks around the box
|
|
Gave away a lot of free-kicks around the box
|
|
|
Commited a high number of individual errors
|
|
|
Had a large quantity of possession in their opponent's half
|
Favoured long shots
|
|
Favoured long shots
|
Favoured crossing the ball
|
|
Attacked down the right side
|
|
|
Attacked through the middle
|
|
|
Had a high shot frequency when in possession
|
|
|
Favoured crossing the ball
|
|
|
Favoured long balls
|
|
|
Favoured through balls
|
|
All those stats shaving where only above lines are offered need to be investigated
Wt... those Tackles stats for Luton are no way right. At least 5 missing... Stats shaving again....
All those stats shaving where only above lines are offered need to be investigated. Only 15 Tackles tracked for Luton are no way right......
just by Sheffield's second goal at least 3 tackles need to be updated. first out in the side and 3 inside the goal when scoring
Be careful with odds on lines where only OVER lines are offered on the games. An organized stats and odds shaving going on. It should be illegal for bookmakers to only offer over bets on tackles, shots etc
under 2.5 goals
Home win or draw
2-1