@Zainmate how that worked is one SOT was a block by last defender which counts as a SOT but not a save. But they didn’t count the 93rd min SOT by BF and they said it was a cross which it definitely was not. Had that same bet
@Zainmate also done this bet. Every app & sky sports said they had 10 SOT. Hour later they all went down to 9 SOT for man United. Robbed us. I watched the game & Fernandes last shot was saved straight at the keeper how they not stating that as a save? BS
I think Fernandes had 3 shots on target the rule book clearly states that if the last defender is behind the goal keeper and prevents the ball from going into the goals then it’s classed as a shot on target there for Fernandes should have had 3 shots on target in the match not 2??
@Pajodublin , you must be joking ? What else is he trying to do with it other than have a shot ? Surely it’s got to be looked at ? Clear as day what he is trying to do ?
@Pyjamas123 wish I was joking. Whoscored have it as a cross which is crazy. Cost a lot of people some money. Opta won’t change it because they are in bed with the bookies
@Pajodublin why on earth cant they change it now , clear evidence here from the situation and all is needed is the check and it would be fairly chenged to 22 shots ? How long after the match is it that they can correct these..
It was here already as a "Bruno fernandes has attempt saved" and as the 22nd shot for united and 10th on target. Than suddenly for no reason its been removed. IT WAS A CLEARLY A SHOT , WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON IF THE OFFICIAL STATS PAGE DOESNT MAKE A CORRECTION ON THIS TOTAL MISTAKE.
@Pyjamas123@Pyjamas123 me also a 100% sure watching the match that that fernandes shot is not counted!! And has to be taken a look! It was already here counted as a shot and man united had 22 shots and 10 on target but than they took that shot away for some unbelievable reason
@ArnieUnited Exactly it needs to be looked at clear as day is a shot on target!! No doubt about it so why was it changed after it already being given? @whoscored
@Pyjamas123 and i mean it was in the MATCH COMMENTARY already said he had an attempt saved at 90+2 , this is unbelievable if its not checked and corrected soon
It couldnt be ANYTHING ELSE BUT A SHOT. NO OTHER OPTION AND EVEN THE PAGE IMMEDIATELY SAID HERE THAT BRUNO HAS ATTEMT SAVED. WHAT ARE THEY SUDDENLY THINKING THAT IT WAS IF NOT A CLEAR SHOT. THIS HAS TO BE SOMESORT OF A BUG, IN THE PAGE
@ArnieUnited they are in cahoots with the bookies and this would cost bookies money. They have no affinity to the punter and get paid by the bookies. It was 100% a shot. There is an actual person who has made this decision.
@Pajodublin why is this always this way If there is a mistake that should only be looked at and when you give all the minutes of the match and all possible details which would make it easy to correct that they dont ever answer anything??
How can there be 13 shots on target, 3 goals, yet only 9 saves? Paddy power refuse to cash out my 10 saves bet because of this. 13 - 3 = 10...
@Zainmate how that worked is one SOT was a block by last defender which counts as a SOT but not a save. But they didn’t count the 93rd min SOT by BF and they said it was a cross which it definitely was not. Had that same bet
@Zainmate also done this bet. Every app & sky sports said they had 10 SOT. Hour later they all went down to 9 SOT for man United. Robbed us. I watched the game & Fernandes last shot was saved straight at the keeper how they not stating that as a save? BS
I think Fernandes had 3 shots on target the rule book clearly states that if the last defender is behind the goal keeper and prevents the ball from going into the goals then it’s classed as a shot on target there for Fernandes should have had 3 shots on target in the match not 2??
@Pyjamas123 that one the defender blocked is counted as a SOT. The one in the 93rd minute they are saying wasn’t a shot
@Pajodublin , you must be joking ? What else is he trying to do with it other than have a shot ? Surely it’s got to be looked at ? Clear as day what he is trying to do ?
@Pyjamas123 wish I was joking. Whoscored have it as a cross which is crazy. Cost a lot of people some money. Opta won’t change it because they are in bed with the bookies
@Pajodublin why on earth cant they change it now , clear evidence here from the situation and all is needed is the check and it would be fairly chenged to 22 shots ? How long after the match is it that they can correct these..
It was here already as a "Bruno fernandes has attempt saved" and as the 22nd shot for united and 10th on target. Than suddenly for no reason its been removed. IT WAS A CLEARLY A SHOT , WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON IF THE OFFICIAL STATS PAGE DOESNT MAKE A CORRECTION ON THIS TOTAL MISTAKE.
@ArnieUnited totally agree with you shocking if not resolved
@Pyjamas123 that fernandes shot on 90+2 after the united corner has to be corrected !! 22 shots for united
@ArnieUnited so why haven’t they given it never seen anything as clear in my life! It’s a shot on target all day long needs to be sorted out
@Pyjamas123 @Pyjamas123 me also a 100% sure watching the match that that fernandes shot is not counted!! And has to be taken a look! It was already here counted as a shot and man united had 22 shots and 10 on target but than they took that shot away for some unbelievable reason
@ArnieUnited Exactly it needs to be looked at clear as day is a shot on target!! No doubt about it so why was it changed after it already being given? @whoscored
@Pyjamas123 and i mean it was in the MATCH COMMENTARY already said he had an attempt saved at 90+2 , this is unbelievable if its not checked and corrected soon
@ArnieUnited correct clear as day this needs sorted out
It couldnt be ANYTHING ELSE BUT A SHOT. NO OTHER OPTION AND EVEN THE PAGE IMMEDIATELY SAID HERE THAT BRUNO HAS ATTEMT SAVED. WHAT ARE THEY SUDDENLY THINKING THAT IT WAS IF NOT A CLEAR SHOT. THIS HAS TO BE SOMESORT OF A BUG, IN THE PAGE
@ArnieUnited they are in cahoots with the bookies and this would cost bookies money. They have no affinity to the punter and get paid by the bookies. It was 100% a shot. There is an actual person who has made this decision.
@ArnieUnited complete and utter joke this should be corrected !!
@Pyjamas123 I contacted Whoscored and have not received a reply. Not surprising really. It’s been ignore by whoscored, Opta and the bookmakers
@Pajodublin why is this always this way If there is a mistake that should only be looked at and when you give all the minutes of the match and all possible details which would make it easy to correct that they dont ever answer anything??
Rasmus Hojlund is definitely not a transfer flop.
@Sputnik He has been in great form past 2-3 weeks.
MU are unchanged from last weekend's win at Villa with Luke Shaw fit to start.
Rasmus Højlund +160 / Bruno Fernandes +260 To Score Anytime
Luton were shocking in last weeks home loss against Sheff Utd.
how is "protecting the lead" one of UTD's strengths - coming from a utd fan
Luton poor defence, United better attack, so ice-hockey score away win. 2-3 or 3-4.
@koziol.mutant Garnacho MoM
1-3 MU
3-1 united